- #PANORAMA MAKER 6 CRASHES INSTALL#
- #PANORAMA MAKER 6 CRASHES DRIVER#
- #PANORAMA MAKER 6 CRASHES WINDOWS#
I didn't think to suggest updating your driver before.
#PANORAMA MAKER 6 CRASHES WINDOWS#
If your Cache Levels setting is greatly affecting your performance, it's possible your GPU driver (aka Windows display driver) isn't playing well with Photoshop. In an oversimplification, you're basically telling Photoshop how many pre-downsized images to create so that when you zoom out the data will already be ready for display at that size, with only minimal additional sizing. If I remember correctly, the RevoDrive actually IS a RAID subsystem under the covers.Ĭache Levels should have little to do with how things like pano stitching will work, and more to do with how responsive your display will be. I get 1.6 gigabytes/second throughput, though I suspect I may have more total storage than you do (2 TB). I chose to go the PCIe SATA III controller with traditional disks route myself. Sorry about the momentary lapse, and to have doubted you. I have a RAID array of OCZ SSDs and know a good bit about about SSD storage, actually. I stand corrected I had momentarily forgotten about the RevoDrives. What do you get in time difference, and what gpu/cpu/os do you have? Looks like 4 is the magic number for me if im doing panos. Try setting cache levels to 2 from 4 (or from you cache level to 4) and see the difference. I hope you guys try this and post your results in PS CC. Someone who can write better English should post a bugreport to Adobe about this.
Ive also tried deleting adobe settings file and setting cache level to 2 in PS CC but its still slow. It also startet faster and loaded images faster, same procedure. PS CS6 圆4 with identical performance settings like when I had problems in PS CC, had no problems at all. History states to default didn't make any difference. Might notice other problems when retouching now. Setting cache levels to 3 from 4 is like 1/2-1 hr in difference, setting it to 2 is 1.5 hr difference from 4.ĭownside is that PS say: Set Cache Levels to 2 or higher for optimum GPU performance. I've tried higher value than 4 (default) but not getting any faster. There must be a bug somewhere, just gotta be when you can't see any difference in resource usage when changing those settings. ~12% CPU, 0% GPU, approx 7GB RAM and low disk spin. Still, I had no difference in GPU/CPU/RAM usage. Cache levels was set to 2 (recommended by PS, not default).
At 00:40 GMT+1 it was finished! 15x 25Mpix Canon raw files, same that took me 1.5 hrs to finish earlier.
Im from Norway.Īt 00:35 GMT+1 choose "merge to pano in PS" in Lightroom.
#PANORAMA MAKER 6 CRASHES INSTALL#
I'll try it and post the results I'll also going to install PS CS6 again and retry with same group of files.ītw, excuse my rusty English. I doubt the north bridge is faster than 3GBs though. Im actually thinking of running that in raid, if its possible. I got the bench somewhere if you doubt I know SATA3 got 500MB/s, you should read more about PCI-e disks because theyre awesome. My SSD is PCI-e and is the worlds fastest consumer based SSD from OCZ with 1-2GBs link. Can't compare to CS6 in speed, so they must have changed something in photomerge after CS6. This slowness happends with small and large jpegs\raw's in different degrees. I didn't remember this earlier, but I made a pano of 50 RAWs in PS CS6 without taking over 1 hr. As I mentioned, I've tried this with PS CS6 and that worked like a charm before. There are no problem with RAW and 25Mpix. Sometimes PS will crash before it finish without making a errorlog. It actually took >1.5 hr in total the last sequence with 15 images, 45minutes with 10images. I got a few more applications running in the background.
0 kommentar(er)
